Whether I follow your plays or not, I always have to check out what you wrote. I like to retain or look back on your write ups on SPs next starts. Sometimes when you have a write up and it doesnt align with what the SP does, it works out on their next start. For example, I recall a fade due to regression on Seth Lugo a while back ago. He pitched a good game and the bet didnt hit, but I faded Lugo on the next start and won. Love your analysis. Like I said, always a must read. Appreciate all your transparancy and being honest. Good luck this football season.

Now, that was funny - tailed you on these picks and went with ML also - Oak let the dogs out and would have covered the - 1.5 ?.then came MIA with the 5 run 9th to cover ML - Sherwood, you certainly had the right idea (except Toronto is, well, Toronto ?.never to be trusted LOL - keep up the good work finding diamonds in the rough!

Sherwood, what happened to Farley? Good choice to remove him, as he is as squiare as they come and he also sells picks.